Some good emails this week for “Reader Emails,” however the one recurring one which I bought greater than any surrounded Jordan V.’s exit. Largely individuals simply asking why didn’t he have an opportunity with Gabby as soon as Rachel didn’t need him. Quick reply: she didn’t need him both. Loads of different subjects in the present day in “Reader Emails,” so examine these out. However clearly quite a bit can be speaking about what I coated principally in in the present day’s Each day Roundup, and that’s the Nick/Blake feud that continued yesterday. You knew Nick wouldn’t let Blake’s IG submit from final week calling Nick a hypocrite go unanswered, so Nick addressed it. May he have let it go? Positive. However god forbid he bought known as a hypocrite, so he frolicked on his IG speaking about why he thought Blake was a hypocrite, to which Blake responded to as a result of Nick mentioned one thing that was blatantly incorrect. And that’s the primary level I cowl in the present day within the pod.
You’ll be able to take heed to in the present day’s podcast on numerous platforms, however you can even tune in by clicking the participant under:
For people who need a shorter model, right here it’s:
-Nick didn’t assume that him sharing Katie’s texts final week was equal to Blake sharing Caelynn’s texts 3 years in the past. His reasoning for that was as a result of as he mentioned, and this can be a DIRECT QUOTE from his podcast yesterday (you’ll be able to hear your self if you could): “Blake demanded she (Caelynn) put out a public assertion, or else, and when she didn’t do what he requested, or demanded, he posted it throughout his social.” Blake’s IG response yesterday was simply referring to that accusation. 100% didn’t occur. Blake by no means demanded her to do this, and Nick’s treading in harmful waters in addition to
fully mischaracterizing the scenario when he says that. In order that wanted to be known as out. By Blake, by me, and Dave Neal addressed it. I used to be made conscious on the time of the conversations that have been going down behind the scenes earlier than Blake launched the texts. I can say Blake is telling the reality. Hell, Caelynn informed the reality!
-Nick should’ve forgotten his personal podcast. Viall Recordsdata. Episode #58. It begins on the 53:45 mark:
So Caelynn says in her interview with Nick that she was in dialog with Blake earlier than he launched the texts desirous to do an interview or launch a joint assertion collectively. But yesterday on his podcast, Nick is saying you’ll be able to’t examine him studying Katie’s texts to Blake releasing Caelynn’s as a result of “Blake demanded Caelynn put out a public assertion, or else, and when she didn’t do what he requested, or demanded, he posted it throughout his social.” Actually? I simply listened to what Caelynn mentioned 3 years in the past sitting 3 ft from you, and that’s under no circumstances the best way Caelynn described what Blake did. So as soon as once more, I’m going to name out blatant lies and flat out misinformation when it happens. That is a kind of cases. Once more. I do know Nick isn’t doing the homework and listening to others opinions or podcasts, however geez, can’t he go take heed to his OWN to get the appropriate info? Apparently not.
“Reader Emails” begins on Web page 2…